As such, the charlatan background produces 0 weirdness. For example, charlatans function by being unnoticed. Some of my rankings are intended to simulate an effect in the game.
If you want to use this for yourself, you'll have to tweak the rankings to match your game's fictional demographics. Keep in mind, these rankings are based on my home setting- an EXTREMELY human-centric perspective, where all civilizations have fallen but that of mankind. The following are the rankings for character options and their combinations. If the players are trying to attract attention for a performance, I would consider how high their weirdness is when determining if they are successful, and how successful they are.
#Dnd 5e character builder drow warlock far traveler free
I might give an eccentric wizard a weirdness DC of 8, and have him give free information to characters over that weirdness score. In a rowdy bar, I might set a weirdness DC of 6, and decide that anyone over that weirdness gets harassed by local drunks. For example, if the adventure involves the players gaining meeting with the local Marquise, I might set weirdness check of 10, where any character who has a weirdness beyond that level will face higher scrutiny and harder DCs than characters who are more normal. Finally, during adventure planning, the DM sets up passive weirdness checks to determine whether certain events happen, or the reactions of NPCs. All of the rankings are then added together to create a total. Rankings can be anywhere from 0 (perfectly normal) to 3 (absurd). Weirdness ranks are earned for the rarity of the option, and also for the absurdity of option combinations.
The premise works like this: for each character option a player takes, they get a weirdness rank. The following is a houserule I made to determine, numerically, how people in an RPG will react to the weirdness of a character's template combination.
0 kommentar(er)
